Oh
really? All three of New England's super bowl victories were by just
three points. They beat the Steelers by just seven in the AFC
Championship in 2002—one of the games for which it is now clear they used stolen (videotaped) signals.
It is preposterous to argue that knowing what play the opposing team is
going to run was not a significant advantage, or that having such an
advantage could not affect the outcome of a game. Of course it can, and
it's precisely in order to avoid opening this can of worms that the NFL quickly rid itself of the incriminating tapes after receiving them from the Patriots last fall.

"I am not a crook"
Obviously,
it is impossible to go back in time and see what would have happened if
the Patriots did not have this advantage. Would they have won three
super bowls without the stolen signals? We'll never know. And this is
what the Patriots and Bill Belichick have stolen from NFL fans
everywhere. They have cheated us all.
As
a penalty for violations for which Belichick has already admitted to,
he was fined $500,000 and the Patriots were fined $250,000 and they
lost a first-round draft pick. By comparison, Chris Andersen of the NBA had to sit out two years for using recreational (non-performance enhancing) drugs. Barry Bonds will likely go to jail for lying during his steroid hearings. And Belichick? He was named coach of the year.
But
who has done more damage to the game they represent? Bonds and other
players suspected of steroid use were under professional pressure to
improve their production. Chris Andersen's offense had nothing to do
with what he was doing on the court. Belichick, meanwhile, knowingly
and repeatedly cheated. Unlike Bonds, who could at least claim that he
was only doing what 90% of his colleagues were also involved with,
Belichick and the Patriots appear to be the only ones who have been
involved in this type of behavior (at least they are the only ones who
have been caught). He wasn't doing it simply to keep up with the
others, he was doing it to get ahead—and he did.
Some people will no
doubt see it as ironic that Belichick and the Patriots would cheat,
given the fact that they are perennially one of the best teams in the
league. But there's nothing ironic about it. Belichick is a successful
coach because he'll do anything to win. This also led him to
compulsively use any advantage possible, even if it meant cheating. All
of this, despite the fact that he probably would have won anyway. Sound
like anyone you know?


Separated at 'gate?
Maybe we
can't impeach Belichick and Goodell, and probably we can't do anything
about this at all. Goodell will sweep it all under the carpet and the
professional sportswriting punditry will likewise downplay or dismiss
it (with Bill Simmons playing the role of apologist #1).
There
are, of course, many more important acts of corruption and negligence
that we should be devoting our attention to—things that have far
greater significance than this. But as someone who has followed
professional sports in this country since the mid-seventies, I resent
Belichick's theft of something that rightfully belongs to all NFL
fans—the chance to really know which team was best. In my book, Tricky
Bill Belichick and Goodell the Lame are more of an embarrassment to
sports than Andersen and Bonds will ever be.
Comments