Ex-CIA official alleges Juan Cole target of Bush White House
Friday, June 17, 2011 A former senior C.I.A. official says that officials in the Bush White House sought damaging personal information on a prominent American critic of the Iraq war in order to discredit him. Cole, meanwhile, is rightfully demanding an investigation into the matter. From the Detroit Free Press: "The Bush White House request that the CIA spy on me to discredit me clearly violated the American constitution, U.S. law, the CIA charter, and my civil and human rights," Professor Juan Cole told the Free Press. "It was criminal." Here is an excerpt of a piece written by Cole in response to the allegations. Carle's revelations come as a visceral shock. You had thought that with all the shennanigans of the CIA against anti-Vietnam war protesters and then Nixon's use of the agency against critics like Daniel Ellsberg, that "the Company" and successive White Houses would have learned that the agency had no business spying on American citizens. Needless to say, this is totally outrageous. There is no way that something like this should just fade away, news-wise. Stay tuned....hopefully we'll be hearing more about this. |

Oh yes, people were 'outraged' about torture and 'extraordinary rendition' too. I remember as far back as Iran-Contra (I was there). The right things get said very eloquently, some allegations are investigated, perhaps some people in the lower layers of the hierarchy get some jail time or see career destruction and that's it. Then it appears to be back to business as usual. None of this is really surprising to a Turk since we see the same kind of thing in a far rougher and non-nuanced fashion. You haven't spent quite enough time here perhaps? No problem, we have the 'net now and through that you can even watch members of American intellectual class in action about Turkish affairs too. I know you are thrilled by and proud of what you see.
Ellsberg is still alive and talking about this kind of stuff, BTW. I don't clearly remember what he says but I don't believe he's saying anything different on the whole than what I imply. He's far more upbeat an defiant than resigned though.
Reply to this