Ex-CIA official alleges Juan Cole target of Bush White House

Friday, June 17, 2011

Wow—some pretty disturbing news

A former senior C.I.A. official says that officials in the Bush White House sought damaging personal information on a prominent American critic of the Iraq war in order to discredit him.

Glenn L. Carle, a former Central Intelligence Agency officer who was a top counterterrorism official during the administration of President George W. Bush, said the White House at least twice asked intelligence officials to gather sensitive information on Juan Cole, a University of Michigan professor who writes an influential blog that criticized the war.

Cole, meanwhile, is rightfully demanding an investigation into the matter. From the Detroit Free Press: 

"The Bush White House request that the CIA spy on me to discredit me clearly violated the American constitution, U.S. law, the CIA charter, and my civil and human rights," Professor Juan Cole told the Free Press. "It was criminal." 

Here is an excerpt of a piece written by Cole in response to the allegations.  

Carle's revelations come as a visceral shock. You had thought that with all the shennanigans of the CIA against anti-Vietnam war protesters and then Nixon's use of the agency against critics like Daniel Ellsberg, that "the Company" and successive White Houses would have learned that the agency had no business spying on American citizens.

I believe Carle's insider account and discount the glib denials of people like Low. Carle is taking a substantial risk in making all this public. I hope that the Senate and House intelligence committees will immediately launch an investigation of this clear violation of the law by the Bush White House and by the CIA officials concerned. Like Carle, I am dismayed at how easy it seems to have been for corrupt White House officials to suborn CIA personnel into activities that had nothing to do with national security abroad and everything to do with silencing domestic critics. This effort was yet another attempt to gut the fourth amendment of the US constitution, in this case as part of an effort to gut the first amendment of the US constitution.

Needless to say, this is totally outrageous. There is no way that something like this should just fade away, news-wise.  

Stay tuned....hopefully we'll be hearing more about this. 
 

 
Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 6/17/2011 1:12 PM Bulent Murtezaoglu wrote:
    Oh yes, people were 'outraged' about torture and 'extraordinary rendition' too. I remember as far back as Iran-Contra (I was there). The right things get said very eloquently, some allegations are investigated, perhaps some people in the lower layers of the hierarchy get some jail time or see career destruction and that's it. Then it appears to be back to business as usual. None of this is really surprising to a Turk since we see the same kind of thing in a far rougher and non-nuanced fashion. You haven't spent quite enough time here perhaps? No problem, we have the 'net now and through that you can even watch members of American intellectual class in action about Turkish affairs too. I know you are thrilled by and proud of what you see.

    Ellsberg is still alive and talking about this kind of stuff, BTW. I don't clearly remember what he says but I don't believe he's saying anything different on the whole than what I imply. He's far more upbeat an defiant than resigned though.

    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.