June 17, 2014
The opposition parties in Turkey have chosen a presidential candidate: it's Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu!
Who? What?
The first round of the election will be on August 10, and will proceed
to a second round if no one wins more than 50% of the vote. While Prime
Minister Tayyip Erdoğan has not yet formally declared himself a candidate, pretty much everyone expects him to run--and win.
What?
In recent decades, the presidency in Turkey has generally been an
honorary position elected by parliament. However, the ruling AK Party is
planning to amend the constitution in order to change the powers of the
president and prime minister, with the presidential position becoming
considerably stronger.
But while the presidency is now being transformed into an elected
position, no one is entirely clear on what exact powers the person
winning this year's election will be entitled to.
That, I suppose, depends on who wins. This is what Deputy PM Bulent Arınç had to say about things:
“Let’s suppose that our honorable prime minister becomes president [in
the August 2014 elections] and his party [the AKP] wins the 2015
[parliamentary] elections in a way that would bring 367 seats, then the
AKP would definitely make a constitutional amendment on its own and may
carry out the transition to one of the presidential systems via a
constitutional amendment,” Arınç said.
Turkey’s Parliament holds
550 seats. A minimum of 330 votes are required for a constitutional
change, while any motion accepted with between 330 and 367 votes goes
directly to a referendum. The total number of seats currently occupied
by the AKP is 313.
In response to a question, Arınç made clear
that what he has been speaking of was not about holding a new
presidential election shortly after August 2014. The issue is about the
president’s authority, Arınç said and added: “That is to say, it may
turn into a concept that would require a review of the president’s
relations with the executive body, the legislative body’s relations and
the judiciary’s relations. This is not an unreasonable possibility.”
My guess is that if current Prime Minister Tayyip Erdoğan wins, the
presidency will indeed become a stronger position, but not if he loses.
Of course, a lot depends on what happens with the next parliamentary
elections. My assumption in this regard is that the AK Party would still
hold the largest number of seats in the parliament, though I think it's
doubtful that they'll be able to increase their number to the extent
that they could make amendments without having to include members of
other parties.
Indeed, if the election news doesn't look good for the AK Party, you
might see them pushing for constitutional amendments before the next
election. But again, it depends on who wins the presidency this summer.
Who?
And now, the two main opposition parties--the Kemalist CHP (Republican People's Party) and the
right wing/nationalist MHP (Nationalist Action Party)--have decided on a joint candidate!
Ready...it's....one more time...
Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu!!!
|
Hi! I'm Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu |
Does Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu have
a chance? I'd frankly never heard of the guy until this week.
Apparently, he was born in Cairo, and he's written and edited a number
of studies on Ottoman science, the Turks of Egypt, and other subjects. Here is his website.
Hürriyet Daily Bugler columnist Murat Yetkin seems to like what he sees. He calls Ihsanoglu's selection 'a smart choice' by the Turkish opposition. This is what he has to say:
For many, İhsanoğlu as the CHP’s choice was a surprise. It breaks some taboos for the secularist and social democratic CHP to decide that the former head of the Organization for Islamic Cooperation (OIC) should be the next president.
But at a closer look, one can see a smart tactical calculation behind the move, for a number of reasons:
1-
The first one to come up with the concept of a joint candidate was
Bahçeli of the MHP. He had said that such a candidate should be
patriotic, conservative, democratic, secularist and with high moral
values.
2- At that point, the CHP was considering coming up with its own candidate. But in time Kılıçdaroğlu came to the conclusion that with only a CHP
candidate it would not be possible to expand its own voter base, but
with a non-partisan, respected name there would be such a possibility.
This had been tested with a former MHP candidate like Mansur Yavaş, who
the CHP nominated for the Ankara mayoral position, expanding its vote base in Ankara despite losing the race by a close margin.
3- The CHP
had one other criteria in addition to that of the MHP. Kılıçdaroğlu had
made an open call to the Kurdish problem-focused Peace and Democracy
Party (BDP) – now transforming into the People’s Democratic Party (HDP) -
to support the CHP’s candidate in the presidentials.
4- The BDP, which shares the same grassroots as the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party
(PKK), which is in negotiations with the government for a political
settlement to the long-running Kurdish problem, has already been
planning to force PM Erdoğan into bargaining over Kurdish autonomy and
the release of the PKK’s imprisoned leader Abdullah Öcalan in return
for presidential support. Despite getting nearly 45 percent of the votes
in the March 30 local elections, Erdoğan will need 50 percent plus one
vote in the first round. The CHP is clearly seeking to give an option to Kurdish votes if Erdoğan does not meet their demands.
5-
The answer came from Selahattin Demirtaş of the BDP, who said their
support “in the second round” on Aug. 24 was not out of the question if
the CHP presents a candidate who "respects the rights of all peoples."
6-
In addition to all those factors, İhsanoğlu is a name from the AK
Parti’s backyard. With the proposal of the Erdoğan government (and when
President Abdullah Gül was still serving as foreign minister) İhsanoğlu
was elected as Secretary General for the Islamic Cooperation, the second
biggest international organization after the U.N. and served for nine
years there, starting from late 2004. This had been a success story for
Erdoğan until the coup in Egypt in June 2013. Erdoğan asked İhsanoğlu
(since he is a Turkish citizen, yet born and raised in Cairo) to condemn
Egypt and implement punitive measures. But as the OIC representative,
İhsanoğlu refrained from doing so and stayed loyal to OIC decisions.
Wow! I think someone's got a pretty bad case of İhsanoğlumania...
|
Looks like the newly-announced candidate is starting
to attract some belieğbers...
|
Over at Today's Zaman, meanwhile, the tone was a little more reserved. Columnist Joost Lagendijk of Morning Joost makes the following points:
First, the fact that the CHP and the MHP managed to agree on one
contender will mean that the race for the presidency is not a done-deal
from the start. A divided opposition with no chance of winning would
have been the ideal scenario for the ruling party, but it would be a
recipe for disaster for all those who don't want the AKP to win.
Second,
considering his background and qualities, İhsanoğlu should be able do
to what is absolutely necessary to beat the AKP candidate: Convince
conservative voters that there is a genuine alternative. CHP leader
Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu praised İhsanoğlu for his respectability and
righteousness; many commentators described the former OIC leader as a
modest and decent personality, an experienced diplomat and a reputable
intellectual. In other words: someone able to unite the country instead
of dividing it.
The question is, however, whether this smart move
will be enough to have İhsanoğlu elected? To be honest, I have my
doubts. To begin with, I have no idea what İhsanoğlu stands for. Till he
presents his project for Turkey, many will be willing to give him the
benefit of the doubt, but that won't be enough to beat the outspoken
prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, assuming he will run for the AKP.
The Joost makes some good points here--especially the last one: no one really has any idea what İhsanoğlu stands for right now. If Erdoğan
does run for president, expect him to get to work filling in those
blanks for the opposition candidate as quickly as possible.
To be honest, İhsanoğlu
strikes me as a classic choice by committee--someone who doesn't really
excite anyone, but who doesn't stand out so much that people would make
a point of going out of their way to sink his candidacy. Hey wait a second, I was hired by a committee...Well, on second thought, some committee choices can end up looking pretty darn great, uh...right?
İhsanoğlu
was, in fact, a compromise candidate between the CHP and the MHP. They claimed to
have consulted a number of other groups as well.
In the words of CHP leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu:
“We are proposing a name who will be accepted by everybody and who will
set a model for everybody with his reputation, honesty, knowledge and
experience: Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu,” Kılıçdaroğlu told reporters as he
made a joint statement with MHP leader Devlet Bahçeli following their
meeting at Parliament.
For his part, Bahçeli described İhsanoğlu’s nomination as “a
fortunate step,” suggesting that their efforts for nominating a joint
candidate should be considered as “a move beyond political parties.” The
MHP leader was apparently referring to his and Kılıçdaroğlu’s
consultations with civil society organizations and representatives of
various segments of society before making a decision on a candidate.
A number of people in the CHP were upset by the choice:
Hüseyin Aygün, the CHP’s Tunceli deputy, complained through his Twitter
account that the party should have nominated “a leftist candidate” for
the post.
CHP Istanbul deputy Nur Serter, meanwhile, criticized
the party leadership for İhsanoğlu’s appointment, stressing that he “did
not represent” the CHP. “I am in deep sorrow and shame. A dagger has
been stabbed into the heart of the CHP. We will evaluate what we will do
with our friends,” she told daily Hürriyet. Serter is a representative
of the party’s Kemalist faction, staunchly loyal to secular and
republican views.
Presumably, İhsanoğlu
was chosen because the opposition party leaders think he will appeal to more
conservative voters. He is, after all a graduate of Cairo's al-Azhar
University, which has a well-known school of Islamic jurisprudence even
though Ihanoglu's degree from the institution was an MSc in Chemistry. İhsanoğlu's
former role as head of the OIC at least separates him from the
hard-line secularist roots of much of the opposition (particularly the
CHP), while his scholarly background should be enough to nevertheless
reassure most self-identifying secularist voters.
Perhaps the opposition leaders also felt that İhsanoğlu's
apparently calm manner would also contrast well with that of Erdogan's
never-ending drama. They might be right in that regard.
All in all, I wonder what sort of message we should be taking from İhsanoğlu's
candidacy. Putting up a lifelong bureaucrat and academic as a
presidential candidate against a political pro like Erdogan seems an
awful lot like leading sheep to the slaughter. Obviously no one knows
how exactly the election will play out--and recent developments in
Turkey's southeast and Iraq could prove troublesome for Erdogan--but still: is
the opposition even trying to win this election?
|
No comments:
Post a Comment